Giorgio Lindi presidente Anpi, Carrara
Caro Losurdo,
Il risultato del referendum dei lavoratori della Fiat ha suscitato un > grande interesse e richiede un’analisi approfondita.
How are you assessed the defeat of the "no" appears more numerical> politics? It can not be considered an unexpected discovery of the> working class, an invitation to take clear positions, including> contrast, both union and a reminder of the forces> policies to have more courage and confidence in the workers and struggles?
54% of "yes" was promoted to master's level, in the name of> "modernity and modernization and has been obtained thanks> to the support of the national media have obscured and mystified> and the way anti-worker and those of trade unions, CISL and UIL as,> which once defended the interests and rights of lavoratori.Da> more conservative forces using the idea of "modernity" and> "modernization" to discredit the workers' struggles to defend> their rights and find that this idea is already present in fascism and> in the culture right in the future in a union as> D'Aragon, etc..
We consider an initial positive reaction to the results of> Fiom, the appeal of the intellectuals, because they are redesigned, so > Taking into account the rights of workers, new forms of> "industrial relations"?
What is happening today in China, which has become the second most powerful> global economic influence on the radical 'economy-wide> world and poses development problems for our countries that never had> placed before . Even India and Brazil are proposed as a major power> industrial and economic. There are common elements between the three countries or> is different developments, which require different purposes> in the design of the respective companies and relationships with the> Western, industrialized world?
DL The referendum in the Fiat is a shining example of "democracy." And 'as if the workers were told: Feel free to vote, but if you vote in a "wrong", you're doomed to unemployment and hunger! At the national level Marchionne expresses the same attitude from Bush (and Obama) on the international stage. At the time the inhabitants of Gaza have been called to speak freely: I voted in a "wrong", are now forced to suffer hunger and even blacker than death by starvation, while Israeli pilots are allowed to practice at the shooting against target Palestinians demonstrate that they do not understand the rules of democracy and modernity.
against the behavior of Marchionne and Fiat finally beginning to manifest a burst of indignation, and I think that in this context to develop a united front as large as possible, it is the Communists Marchionne explained that democracy is no different from democracy Bush (and Obama).
China, Brazil and India have a common element: they are three countries that have a colonial or semi-colonial and now seek independence and redemption, including economic, after having achieved politically.
But now we see the differences. China she starred in one of the greatest revolutions in world history. Brazil is engaged in one way or another in the revolutionary process by which Latin America is shaking off the weight of the Monroe Doctrine. India has been the recipient instead of a sort of independence octroyée: the movement for the emancipation of colonial peoples, which started with the October Revolution and then experienced a rapid development thanks to the victory of the Great Patriotic War in the USSR and the anti-Japanese War of Independence in China, has imposed is the capitulation to Germany, Japan and Italy, but has also forced the retreat of Britain. Just because India has achieved octroyée independence, there are forces in this country who would take the legacy of the British Empire waned.
It 'clear that in countries which have behind them a past colonial or semi-colonial China occupies a place of absolute importance. And not only because it is led by a Communist Party.
the eve of the conquest of power Mao declared, Washington wants China 'reduced to living the American meal', ending with "becoming an American colony." And that Mao was aware that the anti-colonial struggle was passing from stage to stage political-military-economic policy. This awareness did not fail to most lucid representatives of U.S. imperialism. In the early 60's an employee of the Kennedy administration, that is, Walt W. Rostow, triumphantly expressed his conviction that, thanks to the embargo decreed by Washington, China's economic development had been delayed for at least "tens of years." This struggle has not ceased. The left does not understand the most primitive, but future historians consideraranno the action taken by China to break the Western monopoly on high technology as the most imporatante class struggle developed between the twentieth and twenty-first century, as the most serious blow dealt to a ' unfortunate history of colonialism and neocolonialism.